Hi, thanks for looking at the paper. My best guess is that the schedule you want does not exist. What I know is that the construction shown in the paper for larger schedules of 20, 24, 28,... players does not work for 16, and I have tried without any success to find a 16 player schedule by computer search. It is possible to have 16 players in 11 rounds on 3 courts (example 2.11), but of course there will be people with byes in every round.