Round Robin Tournament Scheduling

Recent Posts

21
Requests / Re: Bridge club schedule
« Last post by Ian Wakeling on July 26, 2025, 11:27:10 AM »
I am sorry that I can't offer a complete solution here, as the list of limitations is something I can't address, and as you will see later there are other issues as well. But I can offer some guidance on how I would approach this problem. The first thing to note is that it is possible to have every couple meet with every other couple exactly once in a 5 month period.  So it seems natural to look for a 15 round schedule where every pair of couples meet once in the first 5 months, meet once in months 6 to 10, and meet once in the last 5 months.  So this goes a long way towards meeting the "same pair two months in a row" criterion, as this can only happen in between each block of 5.  Of course this will be a month short, but I think I would attempt to do something special in the last month based on the couples' performance over months 1 to 15.

It is not actually possible to do as you ask: "to go to every pair's home over the two year period".  If there are 16 rounds, and every couple hosts 4 times, then they can only visit a maximum of 12 out of the 15 other homes.

If the social mixing is to be optimal, then you should try to avoid having the same 3, or the same 4 couples come together more than once. Or putting that another way, on the 3 occasions that couples A and B meet, the other 6 couples present should all be different.  It is possible to achieve this, and myschedule here in reply #1 shows you how to do it - just take any 3 of the 7 blocks.

As I have been experimenting with this problem, it's become apparent that my 3 blocks of 5 approach is not compatible with the idea of each couple having a long break between months where they host. So I can only offer the 15 month schedule below where quite often a couple hosts in 3 or 4 consecutive months. You could choose to reorder the 15 rounds to improve the breaks between hosting, but in the process you would make the breaks between seeing the same couple much worse.  So there is definitely a trade off here - you can not have everything that you ask for above.

So here is the 15 round (the 15 rows) schedule for 16 couples A to P. The square brackets give the hosts, so in round 1 from the 1st row, the four couples (I M O P) come together at M's home.

  Group 1  Group 2  Group 3  Group 4      Hosts
(A E G H) (B C D F) (I M O P) (J K L N)    [E B M L]
(O L F H) (I J C E) (G D N P) (A B K M)    [F C D M]
(N C M H) (O A J D) (F K E P) (G I B L)    [M O F L]
(L A C P) (M F G J) (D I K H) (E N O B)    [L M D E]
(C G K O) (B H J P) (D E L M) (F A N I)    [O B L I]
(J N A H) (K L E G) (B F I P) (C D M O)    [J K P D]
(C G B H) (D E F A) (K O J P) (L M N I)    [C D P N]
(I E O H) (J C L F) (A M G P) (B K D N)    [O J P K]
(E B M J) (D H L P) (F G N O) (A C I K)    [J P N K]
(N C E P) (O A B L) (F K M H) (G I J D)    [N B K J]
(G D F H) (A B C E) (O L N P) (I J K M)    [H A O I]
(N K E H) (O I B D) (F C M P) (G A J L)    [H I C G]
(M B L H) (N G I C) (E J D P) (F O A K)    [H G E A]
(K G B P) (L E F I) (C O J H) (D M N A)    [G E H A]
(B F J N) (A H I P) (C D K L) (E G M O)    [F A C G]

If you use this, then a couple will never visit another couple's home more than once.

The table below gives another way of looking at the schedule above, one row gives the movements for a single couple, so for example couple D starts by going to the home of couple B, then in month 2 the asterisk indicates that they host, while in month 3 they go to the home of couple O.

Couple/Round
                        1 1 1 1 1 1
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
      -----------------------------
  A | E M O L I J D P K B * G * * *
  B | * M L E * P C K J * A I H G F
  C | B * M L O D * J K N A * G H *
  D | B * O * L * * K P J H I E A C
  E | * C F * L K D O J N A H * * G
  F | B * * M I P D J N K H C A E *
  G | E D L M O K C P N J H * * * *
  H | E F M D B J C O P K * * * * A
  I | M C L D * P N O K J * * G E A
  J | L C O M B * P * * * I G E H F
  K | L M F D O * P * * * I H A G C
  L | * F * * * K N J P B O G H E C
  M | * * * * L D N P J K I C H A G
  N | L D M E I J * K * * O H G A F
  O | M F * E * D P * N B * I A H G
  P | M D F L B * * * * N O C E G A

Finally note that couples [B F I N] are the ones who host only 3 times in the 15 round schedule, so they should be the hosts for whatever happens in month 16.

Hope that is of some help.
22
Requests / Bridge club schedule
« Last post by w.buttermore on July 23, 2025, 05:31:59 PM »
Hi. I need to create a 2-year schedule for my monthly bridge club for a total of 16 months. We play 8 months each year. There are 16 pairs that play and each month 1 pair hosts 3 others for a total of 4 pairs at each house. All 16 pairs play one time each month. Each pair hosts two times per year, once in the first four months of the year and once in the last 4 months of the year. I would like each pair to go to every pair's home over the two year period and would like each pair to see every other pair but spaced out so they don't see the same pair two months in a row if possible. Each pair has a number, 1 through 16.

There are some limitations that need to be accounted for in the schedule also:
1. Schedule pairs 3 and 13 at pair 1's house in month 1 of year 1
2. Schedule pair 10 at pair 6's house at some point the first year
3. Do not schedule pair 1 or 16 at pair 4 or pair 11's home. Pairs 1 and 16 have cat allergies and pairs 4 and 11 have cats.
4. Do not schedule pair 12 at pair 4's house. Pair 4 has a flight of stairs attendees have to climb and pair 12 cannot climb stairs
5. Pair 14 can only host in months 1, 2, 7, or 8 in each of the 2 years

I attempted to have AI (Gemini, Copilot, and Chatgpt) help with this. I got the furthest with Gemini but still found problems with the schedule it created. In 8of the months, it scheduled one pair twice in one month and one pair didn't play.

Any guidance would be appreciated!
23
Requests / Re: Olympics Scheduling - 12 teams - 8 events
« Last post by Ian Wakeling on July 10, 2025, 03:28:46 AM »
What you are asking is impossible. The "each other at least once" criterion requires a team to play at least 11 games, the "not play the same game more than once" criterion requires each team to play no more than 8 games. The schedule here is about the best you can do.
24
Comments and Thanks / Re: canasta tournament
« Last post by Ian Wakeling on July 10, 2025, 03:23:31 AM »
Hi, look here for the whist tables.
25
Requests / Olympics Scheduling - 12 teams - 8 events
« Last post by samijo512 on July 09, 2025, 01:19:39 PM »
Hello! Maybe I am losing my mind but I am trying to figure out how to schedule a backyard Beer Olympics bracket.

We have 12 teams of 2 wanting to compete in 8 different events. I would like each team to play each other at least once but not play the same game more than once. Any way you can help me figure out how to make this bracket schedule?
26
Comments and Thanks / canasta tournament
« Last post by bks2550 on July 09, 2025, 11:09:40 AM »
Hi,

I am hosting a canasta tournament for (8 people,12 people, 16 people, or 20 people) in a couple of weeks. It varies according to the number of ladies who respond.

We would like everyone to partner with each player 1 time in the tournament. There will be 4 ladies at each table.

We play 6 games 

Are you able to draw up a schedule for us?


Thank you,
27
Requests / Re: Bjerring tournament templates
« Last post by cvvcdad on July 06, 2025, 07:50:14 PM »
Thanks so much Ian!

11 rounds is fine, and better timewise than 13 rounds, so this is perfect for what I need to do on the court.

If you come up with anything else I'd welcome that too, of course. I have a lot of 3v3 and 4v4 solutions that I worked out rather inelegantly, but I lack 5v5 schedules. If/when you have some time (no hurry) I'd love to have 5v5 for 10 and 11 players. If it makes it simpler, the position ("P1" etc.) is irrelevant for what I use this for.

Again, thank you...it's much appreciated!
28
Requests / Re: Bjerring tournament templates
« Last post by Ian Wakeling on July 06, 2025, 09:43:16 AM »
Hi, I think if you have exactly the right number of players and number of rounds, then there may be a perfect tournament, but most of the time, with other numbers of players and rounds the only thing possible will be a long way from perfect.  How far away from perfect probably depends on the search algorithm used, and this makes it difficult to know if you you have found an optimal solution.  I don't currently have an software that might help here, but I will think about some options.

Here is one perfect solution for 12 players in 11 rounds - where each player partners with each other player 5 times and opposes each other player 6 times.

 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6    P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6
( 3 12  9 11  5  1) v ( 4  6 10  7  8  2)
(12 10  3  9  7  4) v ( 1 11  5  8  2  6)
( 8  7 12  6  3  5) v (11  2  4  9 10  1)
( 3 11  8  2  4 12) v (10  5  1  7  6  9)
(11 10  7  5 12  2) v ( 8  1  9  6  4  3)
( 7  6  4  1 11 12) v ( 2  9  5  8  3 10)
(10  9  6 12 11  8) v ( 1  2  3  4  5  7)
( 6  1 12  3  2 10) v ( 5  4  7 11  9  8)
( 9  8  2 12  1  7) v ( 4  3 11  5 10  6)
( 5 12  1 10  8  4) v ( 2  7  6  3  9 11)
(12  5  2  4  6  9) v ( 7  3  8 10  1 11)

If P1 to P6 are 6 positions, then each player appears twice in 5 positions, and once in the other  position.

Is 11 rounds something that is practical?  I guess another perfect schedule might be possible for 13 players and 13 rounds, with each player having one bye.
29
Requests / Bjerring tournament templates
« Last post by cvvcdad on July 05, 2025, 08:30:19 PM »
Hi! The help given here is amazingly valuable! If you can help with this, it will be greatly appreciated by many, many volleyball coaches.

I often run Bjerring tournaments during practice, and also for school vb tryouts. It's not really a problem to define Bjerring tournaments for the number of players at practices. But tryouts are a completely different animal.

In general, what I need is the teams for each round of a 6v6 Bjerring tournament for n players. A Bjerring tournament is player-defined instead of team-defined, so the mixing from round to round is in terms of which players are playing together and which players are they playing against, and NOT which teams are playing each other in a particular round. There are no defined teams, just two sets of 6 players each game.

An ideal Bjerring tournament has any given player playing with every other player the same number of games and playing against every other player the same number of games. I assume that isn't possible for every value of n; if not a variance of 1 from player to player would be fine.

A quick example: the first game of a Bjerring tournament has players 1/2/3/4/5/6 vs players 7/8/9/10/11/12; the second game is players 1/3/5/7/9/11 vs players 2/4/6/8/10/12; etc. When the tournament is over, player 1 will have played x times with every other player, and z times against every other player. Again, this is the PERFECT Bjerring tournament, but a slightly-less-than-perfect format would work too.

What would be amazingly valuable is a tool that allows a coach to input the number of players, with the output being the player assignments for each game of 6v6 for the number of rounds needed. What would be even more valuable would be a tool that does this while allowing for various-sized games -- e.g., a tournament of all 6v6 games, a tournament of all 5v5 games, etc.

I know that's a LOT to ask; alternatively (and this might be a lot to ask too), tables defining 6v6 games for Bjerring tournaments for 12 players, 13 players, etc. up to 24 players would be great! I would likely never bother you again!

Thanks so much in advance for any help you can give to all of us vb coaches out here!
30
Requests / Re: Am I asking for the impossible?
« Last post by Mike Von on June 24, 2025, 09:50:56 AM »
Ian,

You are amazing!



Thank you very much, our little tournament will run smoothly now.

Mike